<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="pl">
	<id>https://jak.mazovia.edu.pl/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Why_League_Tables_Flatter_The_Wrong_Team</id>
	<title>Why League Tables Flatter The Wrong Team - Historia wersji</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://jak.mazovia.edu.pl/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Why_League_Tables_Flatter_The_Wrong_Team"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://jak.mazovia.edu.pl/index.php?title=Why_League_Tables_Flatter_The_Wrong_Team&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-10-29T11:26:20Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Historia wersji tej strony wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.42.1</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://jak.mazovia.edu.pl/index.php?title=Why_League_Tables_Flatter_The_Wrong_Team&amp;diff=1191141&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>EldonBurley: Utworzono nową stronę &quot;It is often said that the top teams in a league always dominate possession. In many matches this is true, but the relationship between possession and results is weaker than the phrase suggests. Having the ball is a means, not a result.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Possession and its limits&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Some very successful teams play with little of the ball and rely on quick transitions, while others pass patiently and still struggle to create chances. A possession figure above sixty per cent…&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://jak.mazovia.edu.pl/index.php?title=Why_League_Tables_Flatter_The_Wrong_Team&amp;diff=1191141&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-10-25T07:01:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Utworzono nową stronę &amp;quot;It is often said that the top teams in a league always dominate possession. In many matches this is true, but the relationship between possession and results is weaker than the phrase suggests. Having the ball is a means, not a result.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Possession and its limits&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Some very successful teams play with little of the ball and rely on quick transitions, while others pass patiently and still struggle to create chances. A possession figure above sixty per cent…&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Nowa strona&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;It is often said that the top teams in a league always dominate possession. In many matches this is true, but the relationship between possession and results is weaker than the phrase suggests. Having the ball is a means, not a result.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Possession and its limits&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Some very successful teams play with little of the ball and rely on quick transitions, while others pass patiently and still struggle to create chances. A possession figure above sixty per cent can reflect control, or simply the opponent&amp;#039;s decision to defend deep. Context decides which of the two it was.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Game state again plays a part. A team that scores early often hands the ball to the opponent and defends its lead, so its possession falls while it remains in command. The reverse applies to a team chasing the game. Looking at possession before and after the first goal separates the two.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A page such as the [https://spinando.net/ Spinando Casino platform] gives an example of how possession sits beside shots. That combination is more informative than possession alone, because it shows what the ball was used for.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Territorial measures help. Where a team has the ball, how often it enters the final third and how many touches it takes in the opposing box describe progress more directly than a bare percentage. Even these must be read in context, as a team can have them and still be nervous in the last pass.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A second myth is that a smaller number of passes means a weaker team. Direct play is a legitimate approach, and some of the most efficient attacks come from long balls and quick runs. Style should not be confused with quality.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Take a typical example. A side with twice the possession can still lose by a goal. The explanation may be simple: the winners defended in a compact shape and counter-attacked once. Possession measured the match accurately, but it did not measure the plan. Seeing the plan in the numbers requires shots, locations and timing. Having the ball is a means of control, not an end in itself, and the plan is what matters.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Where betting markets are part of your football interest, set a budget and a time limit beforehand and keep to them, whichever side has more of the ball.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Possession is a useful descriptor, and the myth around it fades when it is read with care. It explains how a match looked, and it leaves the result open.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>EldonBurley</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>