<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="pl">
	<id>https://jak.mazovia.edu.pl/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=U%C5%BCytkownik%3ARonda69A71728</id>
	<title>Użytkownik:Ronda69A71728 - Historia wersji</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://jak.mazovia.edu.pl/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=U%C5%BCytkownik%3ARonda69A71728"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://jak.mazovia.edu.pl/index.php?title=U%C5%BCytkownik:Ronda69A71728&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-10-11T13:37:45Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Historia wersji tej strony wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.42.1</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://jak.mazovia.edu.pl/index.php?title=U%C5%BCytkownik:Ronda69A71728&amp;diff=1026117&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Ronda69A71728: Utworzono nową stronę &quot;Every weekend, thousands of football tips land in your feed. Some come from tipsters with confident screenshots, some from statistical models, some from the bookmakers&#039; own odds. Almost none come with a straight answer to the obvious question: how often are they right?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The honest answer is that football is hard to predict, and the best predictions are usually less accurate than people expect.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why football is so hard to call&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Football is a low-sc…&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://jak.mazovia.edu.pl/index.php?title=U%C5%BCytkownik:Ronda69A71728&amp;diff=1026117&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-10-10T02:32:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Utworzono nową stronę &amp;quot;Every weekend, thousands of football tips land in your feed. Some come from tipsters with confident screenshots, some from statistical models, some from the bookmakers&amp;#039; own odds. Almost none come with a straight answer to the obvious question: how often are they right?&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The honest answer is that football is hard to predict, and the best predictions are usually less accurate than people expect.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Why football is so hard to call&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Football is a low-sc…&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Nowa strona&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;Every weekend, thousands of football tips land in your feed. Some come from tipsters with confident screenshots, some from statistical models, some from the bookmakers&amp;#039; own odds. Almost none come with a straight answer to the obvious question: how often are they right?&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The honest answer is that football is hard to predict, and the best predictions are usually less accurate than people expect.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Why football is so hard to call&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Football is a low-scoring sport. A single deflection, red card or [https://pinterest.com/search/pins/?q=goalkeeper%20error goalkeeper error] can decide a match that one side dominated. In basketball, the better team almost always wins. In football, upsets are built into the sport.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;That means even a strong model will often be &amp;quot;wrong&amp;quot; on individual matches. A team given a 70% chance of winning will still fail to win roughly three times in ten. That isn&amp;#039;t a bad prediction, it&amp;#039;s what 70% means.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Hit rate is the wrong measure&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Most tipsters advertise a win percentage, but it&amp;#039;s easy to game. Pick only heavy favourites and your hit rate looks excellent while your tips offer no real value. Pick a run of 1.10 [https://imgur.com/hot?q=odds%20shots odds shots] and you could be right nine times in ten and still lose money.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Feel free to visit my web site [https://probapredict.app/ probapredict]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ronda69A71728</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>